Disposed

M.S.Subuu Ram v. M.S.Rajaraman

Madras HC26 Jul 2022CRP(MD)/986/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 seeking to set aside lower court decrees. The court, upon receiving a requisition for further extension, granted an additional four months for the disposal of the underlying suit filed in the Principal District Court, Thoothukudi.

What did the court decide?

Four months further time granted to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.40 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Court, Thoothukudi.

M.S.Subuu Ram Vs M.S.Rajaraman — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRP(MD).No.986 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶4

Tuesday, the Twentieth day of February Two Thousand Twenty Four

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶7

CRP(MD).No.986 of 2013 and CRP(PD)(MD)No.1460 of 2018

¶8

CRP(MD).No.986 of 2013

¶9

1.M.S.Subbu Ram 2.M.S.Dhanalakshmi 3.M.S.Regunayagi (Petitioners 2 & 3 are represented by their power of attorney K.Athimoolam)

¶10

... Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendants 3,6 and 7

¶11

vide Court order dated 4.06.13 made in MP 1/13 in CRP SR.No.9605/13

¶12

..Vs..

¶13

1.M.S.Rajaraman 2.M.S.Jayaram 3.M.S.Subbulakshmi 4.M.S.Jeyalakshmi 5.M.S.Krishnaveni 6.M.S.Alagammal 7.Rajam 8.Magesh 9.Geetha

¶14

... Respondents /Plaintiff/Defendants 2,4,5,8,9 to 12

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/5

¶17

CRP(MD).No.986 of 2013

¶18

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1460 of 2018:

¶19

N.Dhanalakshmi

¶20

... Petitioner

¶21

Rep by his power of Attorney Agent V.Mariappasamy

¶22

..Vs..

¶23

Ragava Perumal (Died) 1.Jayalakshmi

¶24

2.Rajam

¶25

3.Magesh

¶26

4.Geetha

¶27

5.Jayaraman

¶28

6.Krishnaveni ...Respondents/Respondents 2 – 7/Defendants 2 to 7

¶29

: Prayer in CRP(MD).No.986 of 2013

¶30

Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside

¶31

the award dated 24.09.2011 passed in O.S.No.40 of 2008, on the file of the Principal District Judge and L.A.No.113 of 2011 Mega Lok Adalat (Bench)Tuticorin.

¶32

Prayer in CRP(PD)(MD)No.1460 of 2018:

¶33

Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside

¶34

the fair and decreetal order dated 23.04.2018 passed in I.A.No.277 of 2018 in O.S.No.335 of 2010, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tuticorin.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

2/5

¶37

CRP(MD).No.986 of 2013

¶38

ORDER:- These Civil Revision Petition are coming on for orders on this day under the caption “Extension of time for Lower Court” and upon perusing earlier orders of this Court dated 26.07.2022, 26.06.2023 and the requisition letter submitted by the Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi in D.No.752/2024 dated 03.02.2024, seeking further extension of six months time to dispose of the case in O.S.No.40 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Court, Thoothukudi, this Court made the following order:-

¶39

“ Today, this case is listed under the caption for "Extension of Time for Lower Court".

¶40

It is evident from the records that this Court, vide order dated 26.07.2022, directed the learned Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi, to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.40 of 2008 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of that order. Subsequently, at the request of the learned Principal District Judge, six months further time was granted, vide order dated 26.06.2023.

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

3/5

¶43

CRP(MD).No.986 of 2013

¶44

Now, the learned Principal District Judge,

¶45

Thoothukudi, has submitted a requisition dated 03.02.2024 stating that the plaintiff's side evidence was closed and posted

¶46

the case to 05.02.2024 for defendant's side evidence.

¶47

Considering the reasons assigned, this Court is inclined

¶48

to grant four months further time. Accordingly, four months further time is granted to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.40 of

¶49

2008 from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

¶50

Sd/-

¶51

Assistant Registrar( C.O )

¶52

// True Copy //

¶53

/03/2024 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-I/II/III/IV)

¶54

¶55

The Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

4/5

¶58

CRP(MD).No.986 of 2013

¶59

ORDER DATED : 20/02/2024 ========================== ORDER ==========================

¶60

CRP(MD).Nos.986 of 2013 and 1460 of 2018

¶61

SI-(20.03.2024) 5P/ 2C

¶62

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

¶63

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶64

5/5

M.S.Subuu Ram v. M.S.Rajaraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.S.Subuu Ram v. M.S.Rajaraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bothuraja, Vs Arulmigu Maalaikovil

V.Vijayasaravanan, Vs Kirthika

Shiek Fareeth, Vs Mohamed Umare Farooq

B.Balachandran Vs Tamilselvi

R.Saranya Vs P.K.Marthandan

K.Abraham, Vs B.Thiruvasagamani