This second appeal was disposed of when the court observed that the matter between the parties had been settled via a joint compromise memo. The appeal was allowed based on this settlement.
Second appeal disposed of based on the joint compromise memo; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.132 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 26.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
S.A.(MD)No.132 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2755 of 2021
R.Balachandran
... Appellant
versus
Tamilselvi
... Respondent
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 01.11.2019 passed in A.S.No. 17 of 2018 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sivagangai, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 19.02.2018 passed by the learned Sub Judge, Devakottai in O.S.No.52 of 2015.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Anandkumar
For Respondent : Mr.E.Murugan
1/3
S.A.(MD)No.132 of 2020
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant and respondent submit that the matter has been settled between the parties and a joint compromise memo has also been entered into between them. They have also produced a Joint Compromise Memo duly signed by the parties.
26.07.2022
Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. ogy
2/3
S.A.(MD)No.132 of 2020
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
S.A.(MD)No.132 of 2020
26.07.2022
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Balachandran
Tamilselvi
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
