Rajkannan, v. Sumathi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a second Appeal in a civil suit. The first respondent's counsel endorsed the appeal's allowance due to a settlement, which was also admitted by the appellants' counsel.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal was allowed; consequentially, the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.402 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 18.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI
S.A.(MD)No.402 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015
1.Rajkannan
2.Radhalakshmi
3.Kalimuthu
.. Appellants/Appellants/ Petitioners/3rd Parties/ 3rd Parties
Vs.
1.Sumathi ..1st Respondent/1st Respondent/ 1st Respondent/Petitioner/
Plaintiff
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code should be allowed given that the matter was settled and the first respondent endorsed the allowance of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajkannan
- appellant
Radhalakshmi
- appellant
Kalimuthu
- respondent
Sumathi
- respondent
Pandi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court