Chanthirika, v. P.Prabakaran
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed a petition for interim injunction seeking restraint against encumbrance on properties, noting the main appeal was ripe for argument.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed as main appeal was ripe for argument.
What the court decided
CMP(MD) No.4739 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of February Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI
CMP(MD) No.4739 of 2016 IN SA(MD) No.439 of 2016
CHANTHIRIKA, ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT Vs
P.PRABAKARAN, ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to pass an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent and his men, servant and agent from not to make any encumbrance upon the scheduled mentioned properties in O.S.No.310 of 2008 on the file of Principal Sub Judge, Karur, pending disposal of the SA(MD)No.439 of 2016.
PRAYER IN SA(MD)NO.439 OF 2016:
Pleased to set aside the Decree and Judgment passed by the Learned Principal District Judge, Karur dated 04.11.2015 made in A.S.No.24 of 2014 by confirming the Decree and Judgment made in O.S.No. 310 of 2008 dated 17.01.2014 on the file of the Principal Subordinage Judge, Karur.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
CHANTHIRIKA
- respondent
P.PRABAKARAN
Coram
R.THARANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court