Sundarambal v. Selvaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
In the absence of the appellant's appearance despite notice, this Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC was dismissed for default with no costs, and the connected Civil Miscellaneous petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for default; connected Civil Miscellaneous closed. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
SA(MD)No.242 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.02.2022 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR S.A.No(MD).242 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.3379 of 2021
1.Sundarambal 2.Muthuselvan ... Appellants/Appellants/ Defendants 4 & 5
Both represented by Power Agent Mr.Tamilselvan,
Vs.
1.Selvaraj ... 1st Respondent/ 1st Respondent/ Plaintiff
Mohanasundaram(Died)
Kuppusamy(Died)
2.Duraisamy ... 2nd Respondent/ 4th Respondent/3rd Defendant
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the Sub-Court, Thuraiyur in A.S.No.11 of 2018, dated, 20.04.2019, confirming the judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur in O.S.No.109 of 2006, dated, 18.12.2017.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1.Sundarambal 2.Muthuselvan
- respondent
1.Selvaraj
- respondent
Duraisamy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court