A pending second appeal was listed for default due to the appellant's non-appearance despite previous notices. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for default and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
Second Appeal dismissed for default; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A(MD)No.186 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.02.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S.A(MD)No.186 of 2019 and C.M.P(MD)No.4010 of 2019
C.Selvaraj ... Appellant/Appellant/Defendant
Vs.
A.Sreenivasan ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree, dated 26.07.2017 made in A.S.No.109 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil, confirming the order and decretal order, dated 24.03.2014 made in O.S.No.613 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant filed a Memo reported "No instructions" on 09.02.2022. The matter was listed on 17.02.2022, after printing the name of the appellant. Even on 17.02.2022, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation. Therefore, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
// True Copy //
/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
btr
1/2
S.A(MD)No.186 of 2019
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil. 2.The Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil. 3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. (2 Copies)
Order made in S.A(MD)No.186 of 2019 Dated: 21.02.2022
nsn(CO) GC(02.03.2022) 2P 5C
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Selvaraj
A.Sreenivasan
R.Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
