The High Court at Madras dismissed a second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC for non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear and was not represented at the hearing.
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTIC E R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No. 822 of 2003
Youth Social Service Union Rep. by its Secretary General, Mr.S.Nayagam
... Appellant Vs.
1.J.P.Durai 2.S.Prabhudoss 3.A.A.Gopalan 4.G.Saravanan 5.K.Anbhalagan ... Respondents
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 01.08.2000 passed in A.S. No.61 of 1999, on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode, reversing the decree and judgment dated 07.12.1998 passed in O.S. No.343 of 1993, on the file of the District Munsiff Cum Judicial Magistrate, Perundhurai.
For Appellant : No appearance For R1 : Mr.N.Manoharan
JUDGMENT
When the second appeal came up for hearing on 04.03.2022, there was no representation for the appellant and hence was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 07.03.2022. Even today, i.e., 09.03.2022 there is no representation for the appellant.
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mtl To
Youth Social Service Union Rep. by its Secretary General, Mr.S.Nayagam
J.P.Durai
E R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
