Sekar v. Natarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal withdrawn by the learned counsel. The High Court dismissed the Second Appeal as withdrawn with no costs.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTIC E R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No. 593 of 2010 and M.P. No.1 of 2010
- Sekar 2. Balu 3. Ramanathan ... Appellants/Respondents
Vs.
Natarajan ... Respondent/Appellants
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC against the decree and judgment dated 19.03.2010 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai, in A.S. No.20 of 2007, reversing the decree and judgment dated 02.12.2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sirkali, in O.S. No.53 of 2001.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Second Appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
- In view of the same, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sekar, Balu and Ramanathan
- respondent
Natarajan
Coram
E R. HEMALATHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court