Ponnusamy v. Smt.Rajalakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal, the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court, in view of the withdrawal, dismissed the second appeal.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTIC E R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No. 582 of 2010 and M.P. No.1 of 2010
Ponnusamy ... Appellant/Respondent/Defendant
Vs.
Rajalakshmi ... Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC against the decree and judgment dated 26.06.2006 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur, in A.S. No.31 of 2005, reversing the decree and judgment dated 31.01.2005 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, in O.S. No.35 of 2001.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Second Appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. Counsel for the respondent is present.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ponnusamy
- respondent
Rajalakshmi
Coram
E R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court