Meganathan v. Mr.Zachariah
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants failed to appear on the hearing dates despite notice. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTIC E R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No. 801 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010
1.Meganathan 2.Munivelu 3.Dhanasekaran 4.Maragathammal 5.Gnanambal ... Appellants
Vs.
Zachariah ... Respondent
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 17.07.2009 passed in A.S. No.21 of 1986, on the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee, reversing the decree and judgment dated 23.07.1983 passed in O.S. No.1173 of 1980, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Poonamallee.
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.Balasubramanian
JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Meganathan
- respondent
Zachariah
Coram
ER. HEMALATHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court