Disposed
Danush, v. Kannan
Madras HCCRP(MD)/1663/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A civil revision petition under Article 226 seeking to strike off a plaint was disposed of by granting a six-month extension to the Sub Judge, Dindigul, to dispose of the underlying suit.
What did the court decide?
Further time of six months granted to dispose of O.S.No.835 of 2017 before the Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
CRP(MD). No.1663 of 2019
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
¶3
Thursday, the Thirteenth day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Three
¶4
PRESENT
¶5
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.VADAMALAI
¶6
CRP(MD). No.1663 of 2019
¶7
- Danush,
¶8
- Raveendran
¶9
- Saravanan
¶10
- Karthikeyan
¶11
- Santhananakrishnan
¶12
- Senthil Arasu
¶13
- Shanmuganathan
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Danush
- respondent
Raveendran
- respondent
Saravanan
- respondent
Karthikeyan
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court