Disposed

S. Deepan Prabu v. T.G.R. Vasanthakumar

Madras HC15 Jul 2022CRP(MD)/588/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A civil revision petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was closed because it had been pending since 2018. The court noted that proceedings in the execution petition appeared to be completed, rendering a further order unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petition was closed; the petitioner is at liberty to revive the application if the execution petition subsists; no order as to costs.

S. Deepan Prabu Vs T.G.R. Vasanthakumar — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRP(MD)No.588 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 15.07.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRP(MD)No.588 of 2018 and CMP(MD)No.2605 of 2018

¶7

S.Deepan Prabhu : Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.T.G.R.Vasanthakumar

¶10

2.Sureshkumar

¶11

3.Sudharsan

¶12

4.Balaji : Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records in connection with the fair and decreetal order dated 22.02.2018 in E.A.No.75 of 2017 in E.A.No.34 of 2017 in E.P.No.34 of 2008 in O.S.No.129 of 2004 on the file of the I Additional District Court (PCR), Tiruchirappalli, and set aside the same.

¶14

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

ORDER

¶18

CRP(MD)No.588 of 2018

¶19

This civil revision petition is filed as against the order dated 22.02.2018, made in E.A.No.75 of 2017 in E.A.No. 34 of 2017 in E.P.No.34 of 2008 in O.S.no.129 of 2004, passed by the learned I Additional District Judge (PCR), Tiruchirappalli.

¶20

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned Counsel appearing for the first respondent submitted that the proceedings of execution petition has been completed and the delivery was also ordered. However, learned Counsel for the petitioner requested time to ascertain the same.

¶21

3.It appears that the civil revision petition is

¶22

pending before this Court from the year 2018. Therefore, recording the submission made by the learned Counsel for the

¶23

first respondent, this civil revision petition stands

¶24

closed, as no further order is required to be passed. The petitioner is at liberty to revive this application, if the

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

CRP(MD)No.588 of 2018

¶28

execution petition is still subsists. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stand closed.

¶29

Index : Yes / No 15.07.2022 Internet : Yes gk To The I Additional District Judge (PCR), Tiruchirappalli.

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

CRP(MD)No.588 of 2018

¶33

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶34

¶35

CRP(MD)No.588 of 2018

¶36

15.07.2022

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/4

S. Deepan Prabu v. T.G.R. Vasanthakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Deepan Prabu v. T.G.R. Vasanthakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajarathinam, Vs Janani

Saj Jenifer, Vs Manickam

S. Jeevalakshmi Vs the Prl.Accountant General (a and E)

Ayisha Begam Vs Madasamy Devar (Died)

Alagarsamy (Died) Vs Minor Aravindraj

Janaki Vs R.Sankaran