Disposed

Mrs. Jayanthi, Aged 41 Yrs v. Mr.a.S.Mohan Kumar

Madras HC19 Jan 2022CRL RC/1131/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of a Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 401 CrPC challenging a conviction for cheque dishonour. The petitioner, having died during the pendency, had his legal heirs settle the matter via mediation. The Court held no further adjudication was required and closed the revision based on the settlement.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Revision Case is disposed off based on the Memorandum of Understanding entered into during mediation; connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Mrs. Jayanthi, Aged 41 Yrs Vs Mr.a.S.Mohan Kumar — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 19.01.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶5

CRL.R.C. NO.1131 OF 2015

¶6

AND

¶7

CRL.M.P.NO.2 OF 2015

¶8

G.K.Ramesh (deceased)

¶9

Jayanthi

¶10

Govindammal

¶11

R.Lochana Sree Rep. By her next Friend/Mother R.Jayanthi

¶12

R.Mokvun Manikandan Rep. by his next Friend/Mother R.Jayanthi

¶13

(The petitioner deceased LRS impleaded 1 to 4 as per the order of this Court dated 20/04/2017 in Crl.M.P.10942 of 2016 in Crl.R.C.1131 of 2015) ... Petitioners/Appellants/ Accused

¶14

Versus

¶15

A.S.Mohan Kumar ... Respondent/Respondent/ Complainant

¶16

PRAYER:-

¶17

Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for records and set aside the judgment in C.A.No.302 of 2014 on the file of the learned XVII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai by judgment dated 11.09.2015 confirming the sentence imposed in C.C.No.16225 of 2006 on the file of learned Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track No.4, George Town, Chennai dated 11.11.2014.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Velmurugan

¶20

For Respondent : Mr.Umashankar

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This Criminal Revision is filed by the original petitioner G.K.Ramesh, who was the accused in this case, aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and sentence imposed on him, for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

¶23

Pending this revision, he was since passed away and his legal heirs were brought on record. The matter was referred to mediation before the Tamil Nadu Conciliation and Mediation Centre. The petitioners and the respondent had amicably settled the issue and a joint memorandum of understanding dated 04.12.2017 was entered into them and the Mediator has also submitted her report on 04.12.2017, stating that the matter has been settled in terms of the memorandum of understanding. In that view of the matter, nothing further requires to be adjudicated in this revision. This Criminal Revision Case is disposed off, in terms of the memorandum of understanding entered into them before the Mediation Centre and the same shall form part of the order in this revision.

¶24

In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed off accordingly. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)

¶27

//True Copy//

¶28

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶29

klt

¶30

¶31

The XVII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai.

¶32

The Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track No.4, George Town, Chennai.

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶35

+1cc to M/s.Suresh Associates, Advocate, S.R.No.3204

¶36

CRL.R.C.NO.1131 OF 2015 AND CRL.M.P.NO.2 OF 2015

¶37

SRA(CO) PBS/14/02/2022

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs. Jayanthi, Aged 41 Yrs v. Mr.a.S.Mohan Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Jayanthi, Aged 41 Yrs v. Mr.a.S.Mohan Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Venkata Subramani Vs K.Saranya

Mr.Manikandan Vs the Inspector of Police

Vetriselvan Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Saravana Prabu Vs P.Krishnakumar

Mariappan Vs the Inspector of Police

Balu Vs Lip Marketing Rep.by Rameshrai