Criminal revision petition dismissed as withdrawn by the Court, noting that the matter had been settled between the parties, resulting in the closure of the connected miscellaneous petition.
Criminal revision petition and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed/quashed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.01.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Crl.R.C. No.1067 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
G.Venkata Subramani ... Petitioner
K.Saranya ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, against the order dated 15.07.2015 passed in M.P.No.3127 of 2014 in M.C.No.91 of 2014 on the file of the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 15.
For Petitioner : Ms.Ajitha
ORDER
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner appearing virtually would submit that she is not pressing the criminal revision case as the matter has already been settled between the parties. Therefore, the matter is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-CCC)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sli
To
Crl.R.C. No.1067 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
GPL(CO) GMY(10/02/2022)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Venkata Subramani
K.Saranya
D. Bharathi Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
