The Single Judge of the Madras High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the underlying main case had been concluded and no substantive relief survived.
Criminal Revision Case Crl.R.C.No.1073 of 2015 dismissed as infructuous; connected M.P.No.1 of 2015 closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.01.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRL.R.C.NO.1073 OF 2015
K.Saravana Prabu
.. Petitioner
Versus
P.Krishnakumar
.. Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records relating to Cr.M.P.No.3983 of 2015 in C.C.No.87 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dharmapuri and set aside the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Munusamy
For Respondent : Mr.C.Prabakaran
ORDER
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequently, the main case itself is over and therefore, nothing survives in this Revision Case. Therefore, this Criminal Revision Case in Crl.R.C.No.1073 of 2015 is dismissed as having become infructuous. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2015 is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
grs
To
The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dharmapuri.
Crl.R.C.No.1073 of 2015
PCH(CO) RLP(07/02/2022)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case as the main case has concluded.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Saravana Prabu
P.Krishnakumar
D.Bharatha Chakravarty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
