Allowed

Radhi v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC1 Mar 2022CRL OP(MD)/3218/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. involving possession of ganja under the NDPS Act, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted bail. The court noted the co-accused was already released and the petitioner fled the spot, resulting in no arrest. Bail was granted on ₹10,000 bond and daily reporting.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in event of arrest or appearance before Special Court, executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, and appearing daily until further orders.

Radhi Vs The Inspector of Police — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.3218 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 01/03/2022

¶4

PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI

¶5

CRL OP(MD). No.3218 of 2022

¶6

Radhi ... Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶7

¶8

The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Allinagaram Police Station, Theni District. Cr.No.652/2021. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate

¶9

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶10

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.652 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent police.

¶11

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶12

The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 8 (c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.652 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶13

2.The case against the petitioner and another person is that they were found in possession of Ganja. Hence, a case in Crime No.652 of 2021 was registered against the petitioner and another person. The petitioner filed this petition for anticipatory bail.

¶14

3.On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that the contraband was seized only from the second accused and not from this petitioner. The case is registered only for statistical purpose. The mother of the petitioner is the second accused. She was already released on bail by the Special Court in Crl.M.P.No.98 of 2022, dated 07.02.2022. Three previous cases mentioned by the prosecution ended in acquittal. Investigation is almost over by this time. Hence, prays to release her on anticipatory bail.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/3

¶17

CRL OP(MD). No.3218 of 2022

¶18

4.On the side of the respondent, it is stated that there are totally two accused involved in the occurrence. This petitioner/A1 is the daughter of the second accused. The petitioner is having three previous cases. 1.200 Kilo grams of ganja was recovered from the second accused. This petitioner/A1 escaped from the spot, on seeing the police. This petitioner is the prime accused and prays to dismiss the petition.

¶19

5.Considering the fact that the co-accused was already released by the Special Court and also considering the fact that the police failed to arrest the petitioner sofar, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the Special Court for NDPS Act cases, Madurai, and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶21

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶22

sd/01/03/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶24

¶25

THE SESSIONS JUDGE,

¶26

SPECIAL COURT FOR NDPS ACT CASES, MADURAI.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2/3

¶29

CRL OP(MD). No.3218 of 2022

¶30

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALLINAGARAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

¶31

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

ORDER IN

¶33

CRL OP(MD) No.3218 of 2022 Date :01/03/2022 USK/VR/SAR-IV/07.03.2022/3P/4C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

3/3

Radhi v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhi v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pitchai(Died) Vs Mariappan (Died)

R.Dhanabackiyam, Vs R.Muthukrishnan

Ganesan Vs Manickam

Vidhyanand @ Papli Vs The Inspector of Police

Raja @ Karuppiah Vs Ramar, (Died)

Jose Stephan Vs John Gilbert