Ganesan v. Manickam
Case brief
What is this about?
This court allowed a Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC, setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai, in O.S. No.101 of 2010. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
The judgment and decree dated 22.04.2015 in A.S. No.73 of 2013 are set aside and the Second Appeal is allowed.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)
Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of February Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI SA(MD). No.515 of 2015
- GANESAN,
S/O. MUTHU MARATHUR VILLAGE SIVAGANGAI TK, SIVAGANGAI DIST
- VEERAMAKALI
W/o.Ganesan, Marathur Villlage, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District
... Appellants /Appellants/Defendants
Vs
1 MANICKAM S/O. MUTHU, MARATHUR VILLAGE, SIVAGANGAI TK,, SIVAGANGAI DIST ... Respondent / Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer:-
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2015, passed in A.S. No.73 of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 05.03.2013 passed in O.S. No.101 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif, Sivagangai.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Court merited being allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ganesan
- appellant
Veeram Kali
- respondent
Manickam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court