Krishnaveni v. Perumal
Case brief
What is this about?
This Court closed a contempt petition filed against the District Revenue Officer and Thasildhar for disobedience of an earlier order, noting that the impugned order had been complied with. The petitioner was advised that aggrievement by the District Revenue Officer's order could be addressed in the manner known to law.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed as the order passed by the District Revenue Officer had been complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.1259 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Cont P(MD)No.1259 of 2021 in W.P(MD)No.8600 of 2021
Krishnaveni
..Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.Perumal The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.Aavudayappan The Thasildhar, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District.
...Contemnors/Respondents 2&3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Krishnaveni
- respondent
Perumal The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli
- respondent
Aavudayappan The Thasildhar, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court