Durairaj v. R.Mangalarama Subramanian
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act was closed after the respondent produced proceedings showing compliance with an earlier order.
A contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act was closed after the respondent produced proceedings showing compliance with an earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.304 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Cont.P(MD)No.304 of 2022 in W.P(MD)No.11075 of 2021
Durairaj .. Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Sri.R.Mangalarama Subramanian, The District Revenue Officer, O/o.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Complex, Sattur Main Road, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. .. Contemnor/1st respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor for his willful disobedience of the order of this Honourable Court in the Writ Petition in W.P(MD)No.11075 of 2021 on the file of this Honourable Court, dated 06.07.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Prabhu
Page 1 of 3
Cont.P(MD)No.304 of 2022
**O R D E R **************
This Contempt Petition was filed on the ground that the order passed in W.P(MD)No.11075 of 2021, dated 06.07.2021, was not complied with.
03.11.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No pm To
The District Revenue Officer, O/o.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Complex, Sattur Main Road, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
Page 2 of 3
Cont.P(MD)No.304 of 2022
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
pm
ORDER MADE IN Cont.P.(MD)No.304 of 2022
03.11.2022
Page 3 of 3
Durairaj
Sri.R.Mangalarama Subramanian
N ANAND VENKATESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court