Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an earlier order. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order had been complied. The Court accepted this, recording satisfaction and allowing the petition to be closed.
Contempt Petition closed on recording satisfaction that the impugned order has been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.489 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Cont.P(MD)No.489 of 2022 in
W.P(MD)No.4928 of 2021
Dr.PR.Ramasamy .. Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
The Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning, Trichy Region, Kajamalai Main Road, Kajamalai, Tiruchirappalli – 620023. .. Contemnor /5th respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court dated 28.04.2021 in W.P(MD)No.4928 of 2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Kathiravan
For Respondents : Mr.D.Sasikumar, : Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
This Contempt Petition was filed on the ground that the order passed in W.P(MD)No.4928 of 2021, dated 28.04.2021, was not complied with.
Page 1 of 3
Cont.P(MD)No.489 of 2022
counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the order passed by this Court has been complied with.
03.11.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No pm
To
The Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning, Trichy Region, Kajamalai Main Road, Kajamalai, Tiruchirappalli – 620023.
Page 2 of 3
Cont.P(MD)No.489 of 2022
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
pm
ORDER MADE IN Cont.P.(MD)No.489 of 2022
03.11.2022
Page 3 of 3
Dr.P.R.Ramasamy
The Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning
N.Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
