Dismissed

Yogambal v. Jyothi

Madras HC21 Mar 2022CONT P/658/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Paid a contempt petition challenging the non-compliance of an order dated 07.08.2020. The defendant argued that the retirements benefits had been disbursed and submitted details showing that the required payments were already made. The court implicitly accepted the respondents submission and concluded that the matter should be closed.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petition is closed on the ground that the order under challenge has been complied with.

Yogambal Vs Jyothi — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Contempt Petition No.658 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.03.2022

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶6

Contempt Petition No.658 of 2021

¶7

Yogambal

¶8

Nitya Devi

¶9

C.Sakthi Thiyagarajan

¶10

C.Manikantan ... Petitioners/Petitioners

¶11

Legal Heirs of Late.T.Chandrasekar No.45, Vallalar St., Perambalur Town and District

¶12

vs.

¶13

Jyothi, Revenue Divisional Officer, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

¶14

C.Rajendran, District Revenue Officer, Perambalur District, Perambalur.

¶15

Padmaja Revenue Divisional Officer, Perambalur.

¶16

... Respondents/Respondents

¶17

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the Respondents for their wilful and intentional disobedience of the order dated 07.08.2020 passed by this Court in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ W.P.No.10281 of 2020.

¶18

Page No.1 of 4

¶19

Contempt Petition No.658 of 2021

¶20

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondents : Mr.V.Nanmaran, Addl. Government Pleader

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

This Contempt Petition is filed praying to punish the Respondents for non-compliance of the order dated 07.08.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No.10281 of 2020.

¶23

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents submitted that, the order under contempt has been complied with and he drew the attention of this Court to paragraph 3 of the counter Affidavit filed by the 3^rd Respondent. For better appreciation, the same is extracted hereunder:

¶24

“3. ... It is submitted that, Mr.Chandrasekar who worked as Village Administrative Officer, Naranamangalam Village, Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District was dismissed from his job due to non-payment of Kist and debt amount to the Government in time for the period of 06.11.1995 to 27.06.1997. Instead, he paid at delay on 06.05.1997 to 08.05.1997. After that under Na.Ka.H1/11987/1997 on 09.10.1998, the abovesaid https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Chandrasekar was dismissed from service. Based on the

¶25

Page No.2 of 4

¶26

Contempt Petition No.658 of 2021

¶27

instructions given by Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.1901 of 2007 and W.P.No.10281 of 2020, compulsory retirement with all pension

¶28

benefits given to the Chandrasekar under the Na.Ka.A1/2755/2007, dated 13.08.2021. The Tahsildar, Kunnam, Perambalur District directed to disburse abovestated retirement benefits and the retirement benefits were given to the wife of the deceased Chandrasekar Tmt.Yogambal, whose Account Number is 1777108023010 maintained at Canara Bank, Thuraimangalam Branch, Perambalur District and the details are given below:

¶29

S.No.	Bill Details	Bill Gross Amount	Bill Number	Settlement Date
1	SPF-1984	16804	29040006210900 09	06.09.2021
2	Earned Leave	35284	29040006210900 12	08.09.2021
3	Unearned Leave on Personal Affairs	15267	29040006210900 13	08.09.2021

¶30

The deceased Chandrasekar completed 10 years of service as Village Administrative Officer on 08.02.1997 and Selection Grade was given to the deceased Chandrasekar vide Na.Ka.A1/2755/2007, dated 03.09.2021 and Pension proposal for the settlement of GPF and DCRG has been sent to Accountant General, Chennai vide File No.Na.Ka.A1/2755/2007, dated 20.09.2021. I also state that Tamil Nadu State Poll Election, Covid-19 pandemic situation and local officials transfer are the reasons for the delay payment of pension benefits.”

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

Page No.3 of 4

¶33

Contempt Petition No.658 of 2021

¶34

In view of the above, this Contempt Petition is closed. If the

¶35

Petitioners have any grievance, it is open to them to put forth the same in the

¶36

manner known to law.

¶37

SD/-

¶38

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶39

aeb

¶40

//Certified to be true copy//

¶41

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

¶42

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶43

from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶44

¶45

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

¶46

The District Revenue Officer, Perambalur District, Perambalur.

¶47

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Perambalur.

¶48

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶49

Page No.4 of 4

Yogambal v. Jyothi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogambal v. Jyothi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.a.K.Jiyaudeen, Vs the District Collector Cum

P.v.Nagaraj, President Vs District Collector and

V. Subramania Raj Vs the District Collector

Y.Gnanasekar @ sekar Vs Krishnamoorthy

P.Gopi Vs B.Chitra

M.Subramanian Vs Mrs. Supriya Sahu, I.A.S.