Disposed

Y.Gnanasekar @ sekar v. Krishnamoorthy

Madras HC21 Mar 2022CONT P/1661/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-compliance of an order regarding pension benefits. The court noted that respondents assured extension of benefits within four weeks and closed the petition, advising the petitioner to seek redressal for grievances through law. Quality is thin due to lack of detailed reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed; compliance report submitted; grievance to be pursued by law.

Y.Gnanasekar @ sekar Vs Krishnamoorthy — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Contempt Petition No.1661 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.03.2022

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶6

Contempt Petition No.1661 of 2021 in

¶7

W.P.No.20086 of 2020

¶8

Y.Gnanasekar @ Sekar, Shanmugapuram, Muthaipuram, Tuticorin 628 005 ... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶9

vs.

¶10

Krishnamoorthy, Chief Engineer/Personnel, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 2.

¶11

Er. Krishnakumar, Chief Engineer, Tuticorin Thermal Power Station, Tuticorin.

¶12

Rajalakshmi, Superintending Engineer (P & A), Tuticorin Thermal Power Station, Tuticorin. ... Respondents/Respondents

¶13

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the Respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order dated 04.01.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20086 of 2020.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Page No.1 of 3

¶16

Contempt Petition No.1661 of 2021

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran For Respondents : Mr.P.Subramanian, Standing Counsel

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Contempt Petition is filed praying to punish the Respondents for non-compliance of the order dated 04.01.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20086 of 2020.

¶20

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents produced a copy of the proceedings of the Chief Engineer/Personnel (FAC), Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. (TANGEDCO), Chennai vide Memo No.006268/G.58/G.581/2021-3, dated 01.03.2022 , and submitted that, the benefits due to the Petitioner will be extended to him within a period of four weeks . For better appreciation, relevant portion of the said proceedings is extracted hereunder:

¶21

“2. Accordingly, the Superintending Engineer/P&A/Tuticorin Thermal Power Station is hereby directed to issue necessary orders for converting the Contributory Pension Scheme into General Provident Fund Scheme to Thiru.Y.Gnanasekar @ Sekar, Fitter Grade – II, with effect from 01.05.1999.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

The Superintending Engineer/P&A/

¶24

Page No.2 of 3

¶25

Contempt Petition No.1661 of 2021

¶26

Tuticorin Thermal Power Station is directed to take necessary further course of action on the above orders and send the compliance report to this office without fail.

¶27

In view of the above proceedings and recording the submissions

¶28

of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents that, the

¶29

benefits due to the Petitioner will be extended to him within a period of four

¶30

weeks preferably before 30.04.2022 , this Contempt Petition is closed. It is

¶31

made clear that, if the Petitioner has any grievance, it is open to him to put forth the same in the manner known to law.

¶32

SD/-

¶33

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶34

aeb

¶35

//Certified to be true copy//

¶36

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

¶37

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶38

from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶39

¶40

The Chief Engineer/Personnel,

¶41

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution

¶42

Corporation Ltd.,

¶43

No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 2.

¶44

The Chief Engineer, Tuticorin Thermal Power Station, Tuticorin.

¶45

The Superintending Engineer (P & A), Tuticorin Thermal Power Station,

¶46

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Tuticorin.

¶47

Page No.3 of 3

Y.Gnanasekar @ sekar v. Krishnamoorthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Y.Gnanasekar @ sekar v. Krishnamoorthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.a.K.Jiyaudeen, Vs the District Collector Cum

P.v.Nagaraj, President Vs District Collector and

V. Subramania Raj Vs the District Collector

P.Gopi Vs B.Chitra

M.Subramanian Vs Mrs. Supriya Sahu, I.A.S.

Yogambal Vs Jyothi