High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging Panchayat election proceedings, holding that by efflux of time after regular elections were conducted, the relief sought does not survive for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Writ Petition No.21445 of 2013
K.A.K.Jiyaudeen ... Petitioner
vs.
5.A.Sahabudin
... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari, by quashing the impugned proceedings of the 1st Respondent vide Na.Ka.No.1082/2013/A2/AD(P), dated 25.07.2013 as illegal and without jurisdiction.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.P.Ananda Kumar, Government Advocate For 3rd Respondent : Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi For 4th Respondent : Mr.Simon Jeyakumar For 5th Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
Challenging the proceedings of the 1st Respondent vide Na.Ka.No.1082/2013/A2/AD(P), dated 25.07.2013, Petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2013 is closed.
Assistant Registrar (CS-VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
(aeb)
To:
W.P.No.21445 of 2013
MT (CO)
PR (24/03/2022)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.A.K.Jiyaudeen
District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayat, Thiruvarur
Assistant Director of Village Panchayat, Thiruvarur
Block Development Officer, Needamangalam Panchayat Union
President, Pothakudi Village Panchayat
A.Sahabudin
S.Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
