M.Palanivel v. Gopalakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance of an earlier order directing the respondent Tahsildar to consider a representation. The respondent submitted that the order was complied with by passing an order on 01.03.2022. The court held no further adjudication is required.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P. No.485 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Cont. P. No. 485 of 2022 in W.P. No. 13150 of 2021
M.Palanivel, S/o.Murugan, Alangiri Colony, Pinnalvadi Post, Ulundurpet Taluk, Kallakurichi District ... Petitioner/Petitioner Versus Mr.Gopalakrishnan, The Tahsildar, O/o. Tahsildar, Ulundurpet Taluk, Kallakurichi Dt. ... Respondent/2nd Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent in accordance with law for willful disobedience and non-compliance of the order in W.P.No.13150 of 2021 dated 23.06.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saravana Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Baladhandayutham, Special Govt. Pleader
O R D E R
Earlier, this Court by an order dated 23.06.2021, in W.P.No.13150 of
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petitioner is liable to punishment for non-compliance of the order in W.P. No. 13150 of 2021.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Palanivel
- respondent
Mr. Gopalakrishnan
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court