In a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an interim order directing the 3rd respondent to consider a pension application, the Court noted that the respondent had subsequently passed a compliant order. Consequently, the contempt petition was closed.
Contempt Petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P. No.318 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Cont. P. No. 318 of 2022 in W.P. No. 10939 of 2021
P.Thiruvengadam, S/o.Perumal, No.1/61, Kambathukal Street, Ethapattu Village, Melmalayanur Taluk, Villupuram District 604 201 ... Petitioner/ Petitioner
Versus
Mr.M.P.Amith, I.A.S., Revenue Divisional Officer, Tindivanam Division, Jakkampettai, Tindivanam, Villupuram Dt. ... Respondent/3rd Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent herein for his willful and deliberate intention, not to obey the order dated 29.04.2021 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.10939 of 2021 under Sec.11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Elumalai For Respondents : Mr.P.Baladhandayutham, Special Govt. Pleader
O R D E R
Earlier, this Court by an order dated 29.04.2021 in W.P.No.10939 of
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2021 directed the 3rd respondent therein to consider the application
1/3
Cont.P. No.318 of 2022
submitted by the petitioner and pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner as well as 7th respondent within a period of twelve weeks. Alleging that the order has not been complied within a stipulated period, the present Contempt Petition has been filed.
Mr.P.Baladhandayutham, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents submitted that, in pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the respondent had passed an order dated 19.03.2022 and also produced the
copy of the order. Hence, this Contempt Petition may be closed.
further adjudication is required. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
rpp
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ GS/15/06/2022
2/3
Cont.P. No.318 of 2022
To
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tindivanam Division, Jakkampettai, Tindivanam, Villupuram Dt.
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Thiruvengadam
M.P. Amith
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
