Cite petition for an interlocutory order joining with a pending appeal was consolidated and closed as the main appeal was ripe for argument, deeming no separate disposal necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(MD) No.9016 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of February Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI
CMP(MD) No.9016 of 2016 IN
SA(MD) No.605 of 2016
IBRAMSHA
... PETITIONER/ APPELLANT
Vs
1 PONNALAGU
2 RAMU
3 SIKKANTHAR
... RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to grant on order of injunction restraining the respondents and their men from interfering with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property bearing patta No.97 comprised in Old Pula No.103/6, New Pula No.103/6A measuring about 1.30.50 hectares punja Land situated at Kirukudi village, Udhayanur Revenue Group, IIayankudi Taluk, Sivagangai District within the four boundaries namely south by chellasamy Punjai, North by Sangumuthu Rangasamy, Subramani, Sathaiah Punjai, East by Kanagarai Punjai and West by Subramani Punjai Pending disposal of the above Second Appeal
PRAYER IN SA(MD) No.605 of 2016:
To allow the above second appeal by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 05.08.2015 passed in A.S.No.75 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sub Court, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District thereby confirming the judgment and decree dated 21.03.2013 passed in O.S.No.45 of 2010 on the file of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Illayankudi, Sivagangai District.
ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.B.PRAHALAD RAVI, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-
The appeal is pending from the year 2016 and the main appeal is ripe for argument. There is no use in keeping the petition pending any further.
1/2
CMP(MD) No.9016 of 2016
Hence, this petition is closed.
sd/16/02/2022 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
1 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.9016 of 2016 IN SA(MD) No.605 of 2016 Date :16/02/2022 ls MS/VR/SAR-3/21.02.2022/2P.3C
2/2
IBRAMSHA
PONNALAGU
RAMU
SIKKANTHAR
R.THARANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
