Vani @ Kalaivani v. Markkandan
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge bench of Madras High Court closed a temporary injunction petition (CMP(MD) No.9769 of 2016) pending for six years, ruling there was no use in keeping it further.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(MD) No.9769 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Fifteenth day of February Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI
CMP(MD) No.9769 of 2016
IN
SA(MD) No.645 of 2016
VANI @ KALAIVANI ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT
Vs
- MARKKANDAN 2. SANGEETHA ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to pass an order for temporary injunction restraining the respondent from altering the physical feature of suit property in O.S.No.86 of 2005 on the file of Sub Court, Pudukottai order dated on 04.03.2010 by putting up any construction or otherwise till the disposal of this appeal and to pass an order of ad-interim ex-parte injunction in like terms till the disposal of the petition.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
VANI @ KALAIVANI
- respondent
MARKKANDAN
- respondent
SANGEETHA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court