Murugan v. Saraswathi
Case brief
What is this about?
In a Default CMP arising from a Second Appeal, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed the appeal against Respondents 1 to 3 due to the Advocate's failure to comply with the direction to file Batta by the stipulated deadline.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of the Second Appeal against Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 consequent to default in filing Batta.
What the court decided
CMP(MD),No.811 of 2021 in SA(MD).64 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)
Monday, Tenth day of October Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI
CMP(MD).No.811 of 2021 in SA(MD).No.64 of 2021
1.Murugan
2.Lakshmanan ... Petitioners/Appellants
vs
1.Saraswathi
2.Muppulimadan @ Kannan
3.Pannerselvam @ Pappa
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeal should be allowed on account of non-compliance with the direction to file Batta.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Murugan
- appellant
Lakshmanan
- respondent
Saraswathi
- respondent
Muppulimadan @ Kannan
- respondent
Pannerselvam @ Pappa
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court