The Court allowed a petition seeking condonation of a 168-day delay in re-presenting an impugned Second Appeal. The applicant cited document gathering from the lower court as the reason for the delay.
Condonation of delay of 168 days in re-presenting the Second Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.20875 of 2022
in
S.A.SR.No.33984 of 2021
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 168 days in re-presenting the Second Appeal in S.A.SR.No.33984 of 2021.
2.In the affidavit filed in support of the said petition, it had been stated that after the papers had been returned by the Registry, further documents were sought from the counsel and they had to be obtained from the Lower Court. In view of those reasons, there had been some delay in re-presenting the returned papers.
3.In view of the reasons stated, this petition stands allowed and the delay is condoned. The Registry is directed to number the S.A.SR.No.33984 of 2021, if it is otherwise in order.
08.12.2022
smv
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 168 days in re-presenting the Second Appeal is conscionable and should be condoned.
Petitioner (unnamed)
State of Tamil Nadu (unnamed)
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
