Boopathi v. Krishnamoorthy
Case brief
What is this about?
in S.A.SR.No.115272 of 2021 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.20324 of 2022 in
S.A.SR.No.115272 of 2021
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
This petition has been filed
seeking to condone the delay of 222 days in re-presenting S.A.SR.No.115272 of 2021.
2.In the affidavit filed in support
of the said petition, it had been stated that though the Second Appeal was filed within the period of limitation, the Registry had returned and several case papers had to be obtained from the Trial Court and from the First Appellate Court, for which time was taken.
3.In view of the reasons stated,
the delay in re-presenting is condoned. The Registry to number S.A.SR.No.115272 of 2021, if it is otherwise in order.
08.12.2022
smv
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner (unnamed)
Coram
C.V. Kartikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court