R Manjula v. M Muniyammal
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Second Appeal, the single judge allowed an application to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent and her other sons, directing that they participate in the proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Application to bring the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent and two other sons (Dhandayuthapani and Manikandan) on record was allowed. The case was listed for further proceedings.
What the court decided
1
C.M.P.No.17732 of 2022 in S.A.No.320 of 2020
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
This Application has been filed seeking to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent M.Muniyammal. Her son M.Arumugam was already brought on record as the 2nd respondent. Two other respondents are yet to be brought on record namely, Dhandayuthapani and Manikandan, who are the sons of Devi, daughter of Muniyammal.
2.The learned counsel for the appellant states that notice had been issued to the learned counsel for the respondents, but anyway, since the 1st respondent died, it would only be imperative that the legal representatives are brought on record to participate in the present Second Appeal proceedings. Hence, this application is allowed.
07.12.2022
smv
2
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent ought to be brought on record in the Second Appeal proceedings?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
M.Arumugam
- respondent
Dhandayuthapani
- respondent
Manikandan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court