K.P.Palanisamy v. P.Palaniyammal
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of an Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 CPC without hearing arguments as the parties informed the court in writing that the suit had been compromised out of court.
What did the court decide?
The Appeal Suit was disposed of by the memo stating the matter was settled out of court. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 09.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S. KANNAMMAL
A.S.No.71 of 2013
1.K.P.Palanisamy 2.Ayyasamy 3.Tmt.Dhanabagyam 4.S.Anandakumar 5.S.Loganathan 6.Tmt.Sudha ... Appellants/ Defendants 1 to 6 Vs.
1.P. Palaniyammal ... 1st Respondent / Plaintiff 2.Tmt.Chinnammal ... 2nd Respondent / 7th Defendant
PRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and Decree of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Coimbatore at Tiruppur in O.S.No.310 of 2006 dated 31.03.2011 by allowing this appeal.
This Appeal Suit has been filed by the Appellants/Defendants 1 to 6 to set aside the Judgment and Decree of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Coimbatore at Tiruppur in O.S.No.310 of 2006 dated 31.03.2011 by allowing this appeal.
- Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant has filed a Memo stating that he has no instructions from the Appellant and the case bundle is not available with him. His submission is recorded.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.P.Palanisamy
- appellant
Ayyasamy
- appellant
Tmt.Dhanabagyam
- appellant
S.Anandakumar
- appellant
S.Loganathan
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court