Mr.Ramasamy v. Tmt.Palaniammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal Suit filed under CPC was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellants after seeking permission from the High Court.
What did the court decide?
Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.03.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S. KANNAMMAL
A.S.No.670 of 2012
and M.P.No.1 of 2012
1.Ramasamy
2.Karunaiammal ... Appellants/Defendants 1 & 2
Vs
1.Palaniammal ...Ist Respondent/Plaintiff
2.M/s.M.R.R. Limited, Represented by its Company Secretary, 3.M/s.Calic Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director. ... Respondents 2 & 3/Defendants 3 & 4
Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 and Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC against the order and decreetal order, dated 29.12.2011 in O.S.No.814 of 2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge and Fast Track Court No.IV, Coimbatore at Trippur.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1.Ramasamy
- appellant
2.Karunaiammal
- respondent
1.Palaniammal
- respondent
2.M/s.M.R.R. Limited
- respondent
3.M/s.Calic Private Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court