The single judge allowed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dismissing the underlying appeal for non-prosecution. The respondent had no objection, and the appeal was restored for final hearing.
The appeal no. 468 of 2013 restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.1627 of 2022
in A.S.No.468 of 2013
S.KANNAMMAL, J.
It submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant that since his name was not printed in the cause list on 16.11.2021, he could not represent the matter. Hence, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution on 16.11.2021. Now, the petition is filed seeking to set aside the order dated 16.11.2021 made in A.S.No.468 of 2013.
08.03.2022
srn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking to set aside the order of dismissal for non-prosecution allowed?
Appellant
Respondent-1
S.KANNAMMAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
