Allowed
Suresh Kumar Attri v. Dharaniselvam and Another
Madras HCA/2706/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2022 in C.S.No.331 of 2021 KRISHNAN…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.Nos.2706 & 2707 of 2022 in C.S.No.331 of 2021
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.,
These Applications have been filed by the applicant/1st plaintiff
seeking to permit him to file rejoinder to the written statement filed by
the 2nd respondent/2nd defendant.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents/defendants
submitted that she has no objection in allowing the present Applications.
3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in
support of the Applications, these Applications are allowed.
28.07.2022
(4/5)
rst
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.,
rst
A.Nos.2706 & 2707 of 2022 in C.S.No.331 of 2021
28.07.2022
(4/5)
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Respondents
Defendants
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court