Dismissed

M/S. Mugavai Indane Gas Agency v. the Deputy General Manager(Lpg-S)

Madras HC22 Nov 2021WP(MD)/7785/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a gas agency proprietor seeking a direction to relocate its showroom and warehouse. The court held the petition infructuous as the respondent had already considered the petitioner's applications and passed an order. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

M/S. Mugavai Indane Gas Agency Vs the Deputy General… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.7785 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 22.11.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN W.P(MD)No.7785 of 2021

¶6

M/s.Mugavai Indane Gas Agency, Represented by its Proprietor, K.Gurumoorthi Kamaraj. ...Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

1.The Deputy General Manager(LPG-s), Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indane Area Office, No.2, Race Course Road, Chokkikulam, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶9

2.Subbulakshmi ...Respondents (R2 is impleaded as per order, dated 22.11.2021 made in W.M.P(MD)No.11027 of 2021 in W.P(MD)No.7785 of 2021)

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider and dispose the application, dated 02.12.2020 and 30.03.2021, given by the petitioner for the purpose of relocation of the showroom and warehouse of the petitioner's Gas agency within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶11

**O R D E R ***************

¶12

It is stated that the issues raised in the Writ Petition which had been filed for a Mandamus, seeking consideration of application, dated 02.12.2020 and 30.03.2021, given to the respondent/Indian Oil, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ do not survive. In view of the fact that the representations have been considered and order passed.

¶13

W.P(MD)No.7785 of 2021

¶14

2.As a matter of fact, questioning that particular order, the writ petitioner had also filed W.P(MD)No.9838 of 2021.

¶15

3.I am confident that the writ petitioner would have raised all possible grounds assailing the order of the first respondent.

¶16

4.Recording the above, this Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/-

¶17

Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶18

// True Copy //

¶19

lr/sn

¶20

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶21

¶22

The Deputy General Manager(LPG-s), Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indane Area Office, No.2, Race Course Road, Chokkikulam, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶23

+1 CC to M/s.T.R. JEYAPALAM, Advocate ( SR-35546[F] dated 23/11/2021 )

¶24

+1 CC to M/s.AJMAL ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-35710[F] dated 24/11/2021 )

¶25

W.P(MD)NO.7785 of 2021 22.11.2021

¶26

RD(20.12.2021) 2P 4C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S. Mugavai Indane Gas Agency v. the Deputy General Manager(Lpg-S)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Mugavai Indane Gas Agency v. the Deputy General Manager(Lpg-S)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Vannakili, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ponnangan Vs Sivarasu

Prakash S Vs State of Tamilnadu Represent by

Pandurangan Vs the District Revenue Officer

S.Ulaganathan, Vs Gokila

S.Vijayakumar Vs Palanikumar