Petitioner sought a writ forbidding police interference in a property construction dispute. The High Court dismissed the petition as the construction was already completed, rendering no adjudication necessary.
None; the petition was dismissed for no surviving ground for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.8739 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P(MD)No.8739 of 2013 and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013
B.Vannakili
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Inspector of Police, Ammanayakkanur Police Station, Dindigul District.
2.T.Sekar ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the first respondent from in any manner interfering with the petitioner's construction in her property in R.S.No.229/5 in Oruthattu Village in Nilakottai Taluk in Dindigul District by involving in a civil dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mrs.Vijayashanthi - R2 Mr.D.Ghandiraj - R1 Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
Nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed, since the construction has been completed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
2.The learned counsel for the second respondent claims that bundle has been handed over to the second respondent, but still the name of the counsel for the second respondent may be shown.
Assistant Registrar (CO)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
1/2
W.P(MD)No.8739 of 2013
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.
To
The Inspector of Police, Ammanayakkanur Police Station, Dindigul District.
W.P(MD)No.8739 of 2013 19.11.2021
AR(CO) SB(29.11.2021) 2P 2C
2/2
B.Vannakili
Inspector of Police, Ammanayakkanur Police Station, Dindigul District
T.Sekar
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
