Dismissed

S.Ulaganathan, v. Gokila

Madras HC22 Nov 2021CONT P(MD)/1523/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition filed under Section 11, the court observed that the respondent would likely pass necessary orders if left in peace. Consequently, the contempt petition was closed, and a direction was issued to the respondent to pass orders by 10.12.2021 regarding the underlying enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed; direction given to respondent to pass orders by 10.12.2021.

S.Ulaganathan, Vs Gokila — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD).No.1523 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.11.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Cont.P.(MD).No.1523 of 2021

¶5

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.14466 of 2020

¶7

S.Ulaganathan

¶8

... Petitioner/5^th Respondent

¶9

Vs.

¶10

Gokila,

¶11

The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Ettaiyapuram, Thoothukudi District. ... Contemnor/3^rd Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for the willful and continuous disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD).No.14466 of 2020 dated 02.03.2021.

¶13

Prayer in WP(MD). 14466/2020: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court R-8. to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to conclude the enquiry initiated by the petitioner against 4th and 5th respondents in Na.Ka.No.91/2019 and to pass final order on the basis of representation dt.05.09.2020 given by the petitioner within stipulated time.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Mohan For Respondent : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

I am confident that the respondent would pass necessary orders if left at peace. The contempt petition may be closed. A direction is given to the respondent to pass necessary orders on or before 10.12.2021.

¶17

2.With the above observations, this Contempt Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶18

Assistant Registrar ()

¶19

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Nsr/Lm

¶21

1/2

¶22

Cont.P.(MD).No.1523 of 2021

¶23

NOTE:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶24

¶25

Gokila, The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Ettaiyapuram, Thoothukudi District.

¶26

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-35659[F] dated 24/11/2021 )

¶27

Cont.P.(MD).No.1523 of 2021 22.11.2021

¶28

RS (04.12.2021) 2P 3C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

S.Ulaganathan, v. Gokila

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Ulaganathan, v. Gokila

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Vannakili, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ponnangan Vs Sivarasu

Prakash S Vs State of Tamilnadu Represent by

M/S. Mugavai Indane Gas Agency Vs the Deputy General Manager(Lpg-S)

Pandurangan Vs the District Revenue Officer

S.Vijayakumar Vs Palanikumar