Disposed

Vallinayagam. K v. The Assistant Director

Madras HC19 Jan 2021WP(MD)/483/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposes of a writ petition seeking release of the petitioner's impounded vehicle. The Court directs respondents to produce the vehicle before the Court below for release, reserving judgment on merits for ten days, explicitly stating it has not gone into the merits of the matter.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to produce the vehicle before the Court below immediately for release, with liberty to approach the Court below.

Vallinayagam. K Vs The Assistant Director — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.483 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 19.01.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.483 of 2021

¶7

K.Vallinayagam ... Petitioner -Vs1.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thoothukudi. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thattaparai Police Station, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the petitioner's vehicle namely Tipper Lorry bearing registration No.TN 05 H 5672 forthwith.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand For Respondents : M/s.B.Bhagavathi Government Advocate

¶10

ORDER

¶11

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶12

2.The petitioner is having one previous case of the same nature. Therefore, the respondents are directed to produce the petition mentioned vehicle before the Court below immediately and without any delay. It is open to the petitioner to move the Court below for release of the vehicle. As and when the petition is filed by the petitioner, the same will be disposed of on merits and in accordance with law within a period of ten days thereafter. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

1/2

¶15

W.P.(MD)No.483 of 2021

¶16

3.With this direction to the respondents and with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar (CO)

¶19

// True Copy //

¶20

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶21

rmi

¶22

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶23

¶24

1.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals, Thoothukudi District.

¶25

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thoothukudi.

¶26

3.The Inspector of Police, Thattaparai Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶27

+1 CC to SGP ( SR-1399[F] dated 20/01/2021 )

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.483 of 2021 19.01.2021

¶29

KM (27.01.2021) 2P 5C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

Vallinayagam. K v. The Assistant Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vallinayagam. K v. The Assistant Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ameer Hamsa Abdulla Vs The Regional Passport Officer

Periyasamy Vs The Inspector of Police

S. Haja Allaudin Vs the District Collector

Kumaresan Vs the District Collector

Kulaikathan, Vs the Co-Operative Tribunal

Chandra Sekar Vs The District Collector