Allowed

Periyasamy v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 Jan 2021CRL OP(MD)/486/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C apprehending arrest for offences under Section 379 IPC read with Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The Court granted bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail with conditions including execution of a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and appearing for interrogation.

Periyasamy Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.486 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 18/01/2021

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD). No.486 of 2021

¶7

Periyasamy ... Petitioner/Accused No.3

¶8

Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Watrap Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.312 of 2019) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susi Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶11

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.312 of 2019 on the file of the Respondent police.

¶12

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶14

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 379 of I.P.C. r/w. Section 21(1)of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957, in Crime No.312 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Srivilliputhur, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶16

1/2

¶17

CRL OP(MD). No.486 of 2021

¶18

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶19

sd/-

¶20

18/01/2021 / TRUE COPY /

¶21

/ /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶23

¶24

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

¶25

DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILIPUTTUR.

¶26

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WATRAP POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶27

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

+1 CC to M/s.C.SUSI KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-283[I] dated 19/01/2021 )

¶29

IN CRL OP(MD) No.486 of 2021 Date :18/01/2021 PMU

¶30

MS/PN/SAR-2/21.01.2021/2P.6C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

Periyasamy v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Periyasamy v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvaraj Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Karthick Vs The Government of India

Athilakshmi.K Vs The District Collector

Ameer Hamsa Abdulla Vs The Regional Passport Officer

S. Haja Allaudin Vs the District Collector

Ramachandran Vs The Assistant Director