Disposed

Ameer Hamsa Abdulla v. The Regional Passport Officer

Madras HC18 Jan 2021WP(MD)/393/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner sought a passport renewal but his application was pending due to impeding criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and 506 IPC. The Court refused to issue a writ ordering immediate passport issuance and instead disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to seek prior permission from the trial court handling the criminal case.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed by permitting the petitioner to file an application for permission to travel from the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore.

Ameer Hamsa Abdulla Vs The Regional Passport… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.393 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.01.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.393 of 2021

Ameer Hamsa Abdulla

... Petitioner

The Regional Passport Officer, Madurai Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai 625 002. ... Respondent

¶8

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue a new passport pursuant to the petitioner's passport application in file No.MD01C5099715719, dated 12.12.2019 within a time that may be fixed by this Court.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi For Respondent : Ms.Deepa Central Government Standing Counsel

¶10

ORDER

¶11

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent.

¶12

2.The petitioner is a resident of Rajapalayam. He was possessing a passport which expired on 29.09.2019. The petitioner asked for renewal of his passport. The petitioner's application was not processed by the respondent by citing the pendency of C.C.No.7214 of 2008 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case has since been transferred to the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai. The petitioner is figuring as an accused in the said case. It appears to be a matrimonial case. The charges are under Sections 498(A) and 506(2) of IPC. The petitioner's wife is said to have lodged a complaint in Crime No.3 of 2006 and the same culminated in the said criminal prosecution. The question that arises for consideration is whether this Court can straight away direct the respondent to renew the petitioner's passport.

¶13

3.I am afraid that I cannot straight away concede the petitioner's request. The fact remains that as on date, C.C.No.7214 of 2008 is pending against the petitioner on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai. Therefore, the petitioner has to necessarily file a petition seeking permission https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

1/4

¶15

W.P.(MD)No.393 of 2021

¶16

from the said trail Court. Therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to file an application before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai in C.C.No.7214 of 2008. On such application being filed, the same will be disposed of by the trial Court on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two weeks. If the trial Court grants permission to the petitioner, the petitioner can apply afresh to the respondent by enclosing the said order of the trial Court granting him permission. If the petitioner's application is otherwise in order, the respondent will issue passport to the petitioner as sought for expeditiously and without any delay.

¶17

4.The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶18

// True Copy //

¶19

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶20

rmi

¶21

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶22

¶23

The Regional Passport Officer, Madurai Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai 625 002.

¶24

+1 CC to M/s.B.DEEPA, Advocate ( SR-1046[F] dated 19/01/2021 )

¶25

+1 CC to M/s.S.HAJA MOHIDEEN GISTHI, Advocate ( SR-1021[F] dated 18/01/2021 )

¶26

W.P.(MD)No.393 of 2021

¶27

srk(CO)

¶28

KK(25.01.2021) 2P 4C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/4

Ameer Hamsa Abdulla v. The Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ameer Hamsa Abdulla v. The Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvaraj Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Karthick Vs The Government of India

Athilakshmi.K Vs The District Collector

Periyasamy Vs The Inspector of Police

S. Haja Allaudin Vs the District Collector

Ramachandran Vs The Assistant Director