Writ petition challenging rejection of patta transfer rejected; court held proper remedy is civil suit, disposed of petition with notice against limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.19792 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD).No.19792 of 2021 and
W.M.P.(MD).No.16478 of 2021
K.Sekar
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.
2.The Tahsildar, Karambakudi, Pudukottai District. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order in Nee.Mu.4696/2018 passed by the first respondent in his proceedings dated 24.08.2021 and quash the same as illegal and further direct the first respondent to transfer the Patta No.344 in S.No.220/4 (0.20.00 ares) situated at Mangottai Village, Karambakudi Taluk, Pudukottai District in favour of the petitioner within the period that may be stipulated by the Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Kamesh For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Learned counsel calls in question an order dated 24.08.2021 passed by the first respondent in Nee.Mu.4696/2018 whereby the first respondent appears to have confirmed the earlier order passed by the second respondent.
1/2
W.P.(MD).No.19792 of 2021
Petition has been filed, proper approach is to file a civil suit.
Assistant Registrar (CRL)
// True Copy //
Nsr/Lm
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.
2.The Tahsildar, Karambakudi, Pudukottai District.
+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-34089[F] dated 11/11/2021 )
W.P.(MD).No.19792 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD).No.16478 of 2021 09.11.2021
KMV(CO)
RS/PM (19.11.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Sekar
District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai
Tahsildar, Karambakudi
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
