Dismissed

M.Boopathy, v. The Manager

Madras HC14 Dec 2021WP/7106/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed two writ petitions filed to direct the respondent bank to consider representations for educational loans for the petitioners' sons, holding that no order was required as the students were undergoing their final graduation year and could make fresh representations later.

What did the court decide?

No order required; petitioners at liberty to make fresh representation for loan assistance.

M.Boopathy, Vs The Manager — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 14.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶5

W.P.NOS.7106 & 7107 OF 2018

¶6

M.Boopathy ...Petitioner in W.P.No.7106/2018 N.Venkatesan ...Petitioner in W.P.No.7107/2018 ..Vs..

¶7

The Manager, Canara Bank, Marunkoor Branch,

¶8

Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. ...Respondents in both WPs.

¶9

PRAYER in WP No.7106/2018 : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider representation for the educational loan of a sum of Rs.3,60,000/- to petitioner's son Vinoth Kumar B, passed plus two and joined B.Sc. Nursing Course on merit in Vidyakirana Institute of Nursing Sciences (VINS) at No.7, 7^th Cross, Venkateshwara Layout, (Near B K Circle) 8^th phase, I.P.Nagar, Bangalore 560 076 in 2017 – 18 batch by admission confirmation letter dated 24.10.2017 issued by the Principal, Vidyakirana Institute of Nursing Sciences within a specified period fixed by the Hon'ble Court.

¶10

PRAYER in WP No.7107/2018 : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider representation for the educational loan of a sum of Rs.2,32,200/- to petitioner's son Dharmadurai V, passed plus two and joined CE (Civil Engineering) on merit in IEFT College of Engineering, IFET Nagar, Gangarampalayam, Valavanur, Villupuram District 605 108 in 2017 – 18 batch by allotment order dated 06.08.2017 issued by the Secretary, Tamil Nadu Engineering Admissions, Anna University, Chennai within a within a specified period fixed by the Hon'ble Court.

¶11

For Petitioners : A.Aridas MS (in both WPs) For Respondents : No appearance (in both WPs.)

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

COMMON ORDER

¶14

These Writ Petitions are filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the representations of the petitioners for the educational loan of a sum of Rs.3,60,000/- and Rs.2,32,200/- respectively.

¶15

However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that now the petitioners are undergoing the final year of graduation.

¶16

In view of the fact that though these Writ Petitions are filed in the year 2018, no steps have been taken by the petitioners and they are managing to pay the fee all these years. Therefore, this Court is of the view that now at the fag-end of their graduation, no order is required and if at all any assistance is required to the petitioners by way of a loan, they are at liberty to make a fresh representation.

¶17

Accordingly, these Writ Petitions stand dismissed. No costs.

¶18

Assistant Registrar

¶19

// True Copy //

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

Pns

¶22

¶23

The Manager, Canara Bank, Marunkoor Branch, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.

¶24

W.P.Nos.7106 & 7107 of 2018

¶25

SSI(CO) RVM(10/01/2022)

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Boopathy, v. The Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Boopathy, v. The Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri.Manakula Vinayagar Medical Vs The Chief Secretary

R.Devi, Vs Hdfc Bank Ltd.

Mayavan Vs The Chief Secretary

Dr.Abdullatheef Afsal Vs Dental Council of India

K.Kuberan Vs The District Collector

K.Gopu Vs The Superintending Engineer