4. The relevant portion of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.8804 of 2017 dated 26.07.2016, is extracted hereunder: "8.In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 4 and 6 and in view of the decisions cited supra, this Court is of the considered view that the present writ petition, filed by the petitioner, is not maintainable. The respondent Bank, being a private entity, does not fall under the definition of "the State", under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The decision of the Supreme Court in 'Federal Bank Ltd. v. Sagar Thomas lends support to the said proposition. Further, a contract, entered into between the petitioner and the respondent Bank, cannot be enforced, amended or modified, by the directions issued by this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In such circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the writ petition is not maintainable. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed."