Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a No Objection Certificate for specific plots. The petitioner's counsel moved to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach other forums.
Petitioner granted liberty to withdraw the writ petition and work out remedy in the manner known to law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN
W.P. No.4679 of 2021
M. Ramachandran … Petitioner Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, rep. by its Secretary to the Government, St. George fort., Chennai 600 009. 2. The Commissioner, Town and Country Planning, Chennai 600 002. 3. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 4. The Executive Engineer, The Greater Chennai Corporation, Amma Maligai, Rippon Building, Chennai 600 003. 5. The Managing Director, Tamil Naldu Housing Board, No.493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035 6. The Special Tahsildar (LA), Koyambedu Commercial Complex, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, Egmore, Chennai 600 008 ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 6th
respondent to consider my representation dated 01.02.2021 seeking "No Objection Certificate" in respect of the land comprised in Survey No.119/2, Plot No.6C to an extent of 701 sq.ft. on the Eastern side in an extent of 1402 sq.ft., Plot No.6B comprised in Surve No.119/2 as per patta Survey No.119/17 to an extent of 600 sq.ft and plot no.6C to an extent of 701 sq.ft in total extent of 2002 sq.ft at Nerkundram Village, Maduravoyil Taluk, Chennai District .
For petitioner ... Mr. M.Prabakar
For respondents ... Mr. Veena Suresh,
for R3
... Mr. M. Baskar,
for R5
... Mrs.PT.Ramadevi
for R4
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with
liberty to work out the remedy in the manner known to law.
2. In view of the submission made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty to work out the ready in the manner known
to law. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrp
To
1.The Secretary to the Government,
The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Ministry of Housing and Urban Development,
St. George fort.,
Chennai 600 009.
M. Ramachandran
The Government of Tamil Nadu
The Commissioner, Town and Country Planning
The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
The Executive Engineer, The Greater Chennai Corporation
The Managing Director, Tamil Naldu Housing Board
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
