E.Kathirvel v. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought mandamus directing the respondent to consider his application for patta issuance. The court noted the application had already been rejected, deemed further adjudication unnecessary, closed the writ petition, and granted liberty to challenge the rejection order separately.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition closed; liberty granted to challenge the rejection order in a separate proceeding.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 22..04..2021 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Writ Petition No.8212 of 2021
E.Kathirvel
... Petitioner
-Versus-
The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Melmalayanur Taluk, Villupuram District 604 201.
... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the application of the Petitioner dated 8.9.2018 for issue of patta in favour of the Petitioner and the representation dated 3.5.2019 in respect of the punja lands comprised S. No. 10/2 measuring an extent of 44 cents, punja lands comprised in S. No. 10/7 of an extent of 66 cents, punja lands comprised in S. No. 12/5 of an extent of 52 / 1/2 cents, punja lands comprised in S. No. 20/3J of an extent of 19 cents, punja lands comprised in S. No. 12/1A of an extent of 43 1/2 cents and punja lands comprised in S. No. 24/1 of an extent of 5 cents measuring in all 2 Acre 30 Cents situate in Kalathampattu Village Melmalayanur Taluk Villupuram District within a time frame.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
E.Kathirvel
- respondent
The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Melmalayanur Taluk, Villupuram District
Coram
V.Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court