P.T.Ramesh v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application under Section 439 CrPC, the Court dismissed the petition filed by a petitioner accused of robbery and labeled a notorious rowdy with 27 prior cases who had earlier jumped bail.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Original Petition seeking bail under Section 439 CrPC was dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Second day of April Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.3719 of 2021
P.T.RAMESH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs [ RESPONDENT ]
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, M-5,ENNORE POLICE STATION, ENNORE,CHENNAI.
CR.NO.142 OF 2009.
For Petitioner : M/S.S.PONNIVALAVAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR. R.ANEESAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE(CRL.SIDE)
PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to a petitioner classified as a notorious rowdy element with 27 previous cases who jumped a prior bail.
Whether the dismissal of the bail application is justified due to the petitioner's likelihood to abscond and the lack of changed circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. T. RAMESH
- respondent
STATE
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court