not to harass the petitioner and to strictly follow the guidelines stipulated by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. Thereafter, the 20th respondent interfered with the peaceful possession of the petitioner’s property, thereby the petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.11 of 2018 seeking permanent injunction restraining the 20th respondent and her men from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land, in which the Trial Court had granted injunction on 30.01.2018. During the subsistence of the injunction order, the 20th respondent and other henchmen unlawfully trespassed into the petitioner’s land and cut down 4 teak trees. Hence, the petitioner gave a complaint before the 7th respondent. However, the 7th respondent has not taken any action against the 20th respondent, thereby the petitioner sent a complaint to the Superintendent of Police on 12.05.2018 by register post. As no action was taken thereon, the petitioner lodged a second complaint on 21.09.2018 to the 6th respondent and after continuous persuasion, an F.I.R. was registered against the 20th respondent for the offences under Sections 294(b), 324, 504(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.814 of 108. While so, the local people, namely, the respondent Nos.10 to 21 illegally held a Katta Panchayat in Kuppur Village and the petitioner was summoned to the said Katta Panchayat and the respondents 10 to 21 threatened the petitioner and directed the petitioner to execute a sale deed in favour of the 20th respondent. The law enforcing agency also colluded with the 20th respondent and harassed the petitioner and gave life threat. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the above said prayer.
