Allowed

N.Kayalvizhi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC17 Dec 2021WP/27011/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed under Article 226 praying for a writ of mandamus to direct the District Collector and Tahsildar to dispose of the petitioner's pending representation regarding measurement of her property. Court directed the third respondent to consider the representation, issue notices to stakeholders, and conduct an enquiry within twelve weeks on payment of fees. Petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Directed third respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 06.10.2021, notice relevant parties, conduct enquiry, and order measurement of property within 12 weeks on payment of fees.

N.Kayalvizhi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 17.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P.NO.27011 OF 2021

¶6

N.Kayalvizhi ... Petitioner

¶7

.Vs.

¶8

The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government,

¶9

Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George,

¶10

Chennai - 600 009.

¶11

The District Collector, O/o District Collector Office, Thiruvallur,

¶12

Thiruvallur District.

¶13

The Tahsildar, O/o.Avadi Taluk Office, Avadi, Chennai - 600 054. ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 06.10.2021 and conduct an enquiry to make necessary action to measure the schedule mentioned property belongs to the petitioner.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Jaishankar

¶16

For Respondents : Mr.G.Krishnaraja Additional Government Pleader

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This writ petition is filed for direction directing the first and second respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 06.10.2021 and conduct an enquiry to make necessary action to measure the schedule mentioned property belongs to the petitioner.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

The petitioner submitted representation to measure her property, which is pending. Therefore, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.10.2021 and conduct enquiry after issuance of notice to the petitioner, the adjacent land owners and counter parties, if any, and, after giving them opportunity of hearing, pass orders to measure the schedule mentioned property belongs to her, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, on payment of requisite fees.

¶21

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed

¶22

of. No order as to costs.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶25

//True Copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

lok

¶28

¶29

The Secretary to Government, State of Tamilnadu, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶30

The District Collector, O/o.District Collector Office,

¶31

Thiruvallur,

¶32

Thiruvallur District.

¶33

The Tahsildar, O/o.Avadi Taluk Office,

¶34

Avadi, Chennai - 600 054.

¶35

+2ccs to Mr.V.Jaishankar, Advocate, S.R.No.67732 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.68330

¶36

W.P.No.27011 of 2021

¶37

CP(CO) PBS/11/01/2022

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Kayalvizhi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Kayalvizhi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Venkataraman Vs The Tahsildar

S.J.Sathish Kumaran Vs the Inspector General of

V.Selvakumar Vs The Tamil Nadu Housing Board

Siddappa Vs The Special Secretary to Government

A.Suseela Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

A.Suseela Vs the Tahsildar