Remanded

K.Venkataraman v. The Tahsildar

Madras HC16 Dec 2021WP/26863/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras issued a writ of mandamus directing Respondents 1 and 2 to survey a specific property in Tiruvallur District after issuing notice to the petitioner, adjacent owners, and the third respondent, without deciding the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conduct survey of property after notice to petitioner, adjacent owners, and third respondent within six weeks on payment of fees.

K.Venkataraman Vs The Tahsildar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P.NO.26863 OF 2021 AND W.M.P.NO.28316 OF 2021

K.Venkataraman

... Petitioner

vs.

The Tahsildar, Avadi Taluk Office, Avadi, Chennai - 600 054.

¶10

The Taluk Surveyor, Avadi Taluk Office, Avadi, Chennai - 600 054.

¶11

P.Mani

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 and 2 from conducting survey of the property bearing Door No.22, 3^rd Main Road, Krishnapuram, Thiruninravur, Chennai - 602 024 comprised in S.F.No.254/2AA, Thiruninravur Village, Ambattur Taluk and Tiruvallur District by metes and bounds.

¶14

For Petitioner : Dr.S.S.Swaminathan

¶15

For R1 and R2 : Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan Additional Government Pleader

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This writ petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 and 2 to conduct survey of the property bearing Door No.22, 3^rd Main Road, Krishnapuram,

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Thiruninravur, Chennai - 602 024 comprised in S.F.No.254/2AA, Thiruninravur Village, Ambattur Taluk and Tiruvallur District by metes and bounds.

¶20

Considering the limited relief sought for in the

¶21

petition, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, the 1^st and 2^nd respondents are directed to survey the subject property, after issuance of notice to the petitioner, adjacent land owners and the 3^rd respondent and also counter parties, if any within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on payment of requisite fees.

¶22

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)

¶25

//True Copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

¶28

¶29

The Tahsildar, Avadi Taluk Office, Avadi, Chennai - 600 054.

¶30

The Taluk Surveyor, Avadi Taluk Office, Avadi,

¶31

Chennai - 600 054.

¶32

+1cc to M/s.Dr.S.S.Swaminathan, Advocate, S.R.No.67643

¶33

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.68291

¶34

W.P.No.26863 of 2021

¶35

BP(CO) RLP(05/01/2022)

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Venkataraman v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Venkataraman v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Poongodi Vs The Sub Registrar

N.Haribabu Vs The Inspector General of Registration

K.Ravi Vs The District Revenue Officer

K.Senthamarai Kannan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M.Murugavel Vs The Special Tashildar

M.Malle Gowda Vs The District Revenue Officer